Immersive Roulette Online Casino Scam Exposed Watch This Video
So I decided to do a little statistical analysis.
I played 500 hands.
I is video blackjack rigged the dealer's up card in a spreadsheet for every hand, and their end result.
Further, I noted the starting value of each player hand all 7and noted THEIR result.
I never partook in extra activities such as double downing or splitting in order to keep the results consistent.
I leveraged the results of these 500 hands against the standard probability afforded to a standard 7 deck shoe, and did not include any padding for deviations due to "weight" of the deck, as hand-to-hand I was given proof that the decks would be virtually re-shuffled in between each hand.
The results were shockingly is video blackjack rigged with regards to fairness of this particular game within the video game.
Below is the dealer's up card, which will be followed by the probability of "busting", the actual bust rate, as well as the average final score the dealer acquired.
Suffice to say, the player numbers were just as skewed with regards to actual probability, except in this instance the player was significantly MORE likely to bust than statistical probability states.
Statistically, the player was also much more likely to start with an "at risk" hand that being a starting total between 12 and 16 than probability and standard deviation would normally state.
So, statistically, the dealer in video blackjack is only busting about 25% as often as they statistically should.
The player, however, is video blackjack rigged roughly 31% MORE than they statistically should.
Blackjack is already a negative odds game to the player, and this massaging of the RNG to so grossly favour the dealer makes it little more than a carnival type game.
Further, you are asked to pay 8 hands worth of chips, but are only given 7 hands of cards, therefore further enhancing house advantage by 12.
To make matters worse, the average final value of the dealer's hand falls well above the average that would be normally expected.
When statistics state that a dealer, for example, only has a continue reading chance to score 19-21, yet averages well into this number, indicates that not only is the dealer busting at an abnormally small rate, but is "nutting" cards to complete hands at a significantly higher than normal rate.
The conclusion with regards to these numbers?
Given that the dealer will almost never bust, you cannot employ best practices with regards to play of blackjack from a player's perspective with this game i.
Further, given the dealer's propensity for not only making a hand, but making a hand at the higher end of the scale, it actually becomes more statistically sound for the player to hit on all 17's, and even 18's, regardless of what the dealer has showing up, because the dealer will not bust and it's likely that the dealer will have at least a 19 when it's all said and done.
In short, the video blackjack aspect of the 4 Kings Casino is configured as nothing but a con game, rigged to the point of making it little more than a digital scam.
Whomever coded it needs to tune the settings to bring it read article in line with realistic statistical probability.
As it is currently configured, this particular game would be classified as "broken" by any objective measure.
Last edited by Poppinfresh 15 Feb 2016 06:44 Thanks for the hard work and detailed analysis.
I noticed the exact same trend and had to switch my tactics up when completing the 'marathon' is video blackjack rigged />I haven't really played much video blackjack since.
I have seen the posts about using "standard blackjack strategy" from DL, but it does not work.
I am very suspicious that the BJ tables are also rigged.
I did several card counting exercises and one time ended up at +43, and that is pretty much impossible with 6 decks at any casino.
If it smells like fish, it is probably a fish.
My husband who used to play professionally meaning made a meager living at it told me to never spend money on chips in this source because after watching how the cards dropped, he thought something was definitely wrong, especially with all the 10 ups for the dealer and bust hands for the player.
Nevertheless, I have bought some clothes, though, but I think I would have better luck at a real casino.
That is a bit sad.
Otherwise, it was a fun environment, but I am giving the PS4 over to him more and more for the sports games that he likes.
Maybe I will become a better cook since I am in the kitchen more.
LOLWe do not do anything to skew the randomness of our games.
Its unnecessary since Casino game payouts are designed with the randomness in mind.
Video Blackjack only uses a single deck, which is shuffled every game so you might want to take that into account when you're playing.
Our stats for VBJ are showing a house edge of approximately 9%.
This is exactly what we expected, given that you pay for 8 hands, but https://fukiya.info/blackjack/house-edge-in-free-bet-blackjack.html play 7.
As for table blackjack our stats are showing a house edge of roughly 3%.
This is a bit higher than optimal play ~1% but, again about what we'd expect since not all our users are playing optimally.
Its worth noting that VIP users tend to perform 1-2% better than user's on the main floor, again reinforcing our assumption that not all players are playing optimally.
I can adjust the bust probability rate to the following if it is single deck something I question, though I'm unwilling to play the game for a while to see a redundant card in a given series of hands.
It would then be: 2: 35.
The actual bust rate is still well below that of statistical probability, even accounting a wide padding for variance.
The numbers simply don't support it.
Single deck blackjack, when played optimally, has only a.
So even if I am to disregard to my own statistical analysis and 3500 hands is a sufficient field of play, IMOthe game is still tweaked far too much towards house.
I mean, if it is what it is, that's fine and all - this is, after all, a free game.
But if there's any real desire or impetus to get players to purchase chips with actual money, rigging the games that far in the house's favour isn't a real good way to go about it.
As I said, the majority of the edge comes from the fact that you pay for 8 hands, but only play 7.
For table blackjack, the house edge is around 3%.
Given that not everyone is playing optimally, I feel this is close enough to our expected result not to warrant concern.
As I said before, we do not do anything to influence the random number generator, as it is unnecessary and would be much more complicated than just letting the game play out naturally.
I think the bust rate at 6 is what upsets most of us.
I cannot tell you how many times I have had the dealer show a 6 get a face card to show 16 and then hit 4 or 5 to get 20 or 21.
In fact this occurs to much that when the dealer shows a 5 or 6 the highest probability for a bust the player has to switch there strategy to start hitting on 14, 15, 16 normally card amounts you would never consider with that the dealer is showing.
And then when we do hit on those numbers we bust but magically the dealer can hit 20 or 21.
It always amazes me how people think these games are rigged.
Anybody can go on google and figure out the odds on any of these games and it's no secret that this is how casinos make money.
The player NEVER wins in the long run.
Any pattern that looks like it's not fair or rigged is just random luck and analysis over the long run would prove it.
They are skewed toward the casino by nature.
But then, this leads me to say I wish Four Kings would change some of the rules on some games to make them pay out more often.
People would be happier and more apt to stay in the game longer if pay out was better.
As this isn't a real casino, the house doesn't need to be profitable.
Mvid you can say what you want maybe its not "rigged" but the algarethm is definetly skewed.
The stats do not lie.
I have done the analysis myself and if vegas blackjack double exposure in play long enough you woll perfect pair blackjack calculation yourself.
It completly changes the way you play the game.
I will have to guess that Digital Leisure has done automated statistical testing on their games like they say they have and they say it seems to be as blackjack bar and grill for them.
So if what your limited sampling for stats show is true, then there is a bug in their code which their testing hasn't found.
I mean, this could very well be the case, but unlikely.
Mvid wrote But how big is your sample size?
My stats are from about 8 million played games since we released on PS4.
Rigged Roulette at Portomaso Scam Casino . Ezugi Scam - Proof Video . 28-7-2017
Wow if the Blackjack is not a little out of wack idk what to say... Your random. YouTube™ Video: Blackjack Rigged! (Four Kings Casino).
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. Write to me in PM.
It is simply magnificent idea
What words... super, a magnificent idea